A few of our very own foregoing considerations give credence towards contention one to metaphor is actually a keen analogous term. That is substantiated from the St Thomas’ techniques concerned thirteen out-of the fresh Prima Pars , due to the fact in the blog post about three, when he requires if any name’s told you properly regarding Jesus, the newest resistance lead for the gamble are anywhere between use proprie and you may improprie to your latter known which have metaphor. Next, during the blog post half a dozen, when he requires if the brands preferred to help you Jesus and you may creatures was basic told you out-of pets, the distinction proprie/improprie seems to be a good subdivision away from analogous identity. St Thomas starts of the saying that “in omnibus nominibus quae de pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur for every single respectum advertisement unum: ainsi que ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur when you look at the definitione omnium. Mais aussi quia proportion quam significat nomen for each prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur inside definitione aliorum, et for every single posterius de aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant advertisement illud primum vel magis vel minus.” This really is exemplified of the dated credible, “compliment.” “Sic buy college essays online therefore omni nomina quae metaphorice de- Deo dicuntur per prius de- creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de Deo, nihil aliud significant quam similitudines offer stories creaturas.” St. Thomas observes brand new resemblance off ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) created when you look at the “smiling meadow” plus in calling Jesus a beneficial lion.
As he continues to speak regarding most other labels “quae low metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,” the new obvious perception would be the fact he could be speaking off most other hours away from analogous brands than just metaphors
Are there messages where St Thomas opposes metaphor and you will example? If we consider the latest feedback for the Metaphysics , we discover St Thomas determining “potency” to your analogous and equivocal settings. “Potency” setting unique. “Sed ista multiplicitas quantum post quosdam analogiae.” The fresh equivocal settings off strength is exemplified incidentally i talk about step 3 to the 3rd stamina and of this new cube because strength of range. “Et propter hoc for every quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens in the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens in the rem” Once more a great proportionality find. These particular equivocal methods are indeed metaphors is obvious regarding the synchronous passage in book Delta inside commenting about what St Thomas begins, “Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.” Exactly why are this type of modes metaphorical and not analogical? “His for this reason modis praetermissis, considerandum est de- potentiis, quae reducuntur post unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, ainsi que omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur offer aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.” In a nutshell, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor so you can analogous uses of a reputation since latter rather than the former include a reduction in order to what is actually mainly denominated of the word in question while, is they you desire citing, regarding the text message of your Summa we considered an additional back, new metaphor wasn’t renowned from the expansion proprie on this subject foundation. Or is they the way of mention of the what is actually principally signifed because of the title and therefore distinguishes metaphor away from analogy, need proprie out of improprie ? One thing titled metaphorically was, anyway, taken to getting exactly like just what term securely represents.
What we should shall be selecting is a few technique for justifying the fresh fairly common distinction regarding metaphor and you will analogy in a way that zero attract was created to Cajetan’s division away from example with the attribution and correct proportionality
An enthusiastic aporia features demonstrably came up, thus, and its particular resolution can simply getting had by deciding just what an excellent metaphor are and you will exactly what a keen analogous name is. Remedies for these questions is enable us to comprehend the frequently contradictory statements from Aquinas.
